Over the past 20 years, public policies have set ambitious targets to reduce carbon emissions related to mobility, especially to tackle air pollution and climate change. In 2019, in France, the transportation sector accounted for 31% of greenhouse-gas (GHG) emissions in France. Yet since this date there has been no tangible indication that these emissions would go down. Despite proactive policies to promote electric vehicles and to encourage motorists to switch to other travel modes (public transit, cycling, walking), GHG emissions continued to grow between 2010 and 2019.
However, the Covid-19 crisis and the ensuing measures from early 2020 had a significant impact on mobilities. Daily mobilities were affected by lockdowns in the spring of 2020 and by the rise of teleworking. Long-distance trips were suspended with borders closing down and movements restricted. The transportation of goods was interrupted by disruptions in supply chains. Many actors decided to seize this unprecedented opportunity to profoundly question our mobility systems and lifestyles. New individual and collective behaviors have since emerged and public policies have been initiated to prepare the "post-pandemic world.” But do all these changes herald a future in which we properly address the challenges of an ecological transition in transportation and mobility, and really consider the aspirations of many to live in greater proximity and to control their pace of life? How can we characterize the changes observed since 2020 in our mobility practices and public policies? Were the measures taken to manage the Covid-19 epidemic just temporary adaptations to an emergency situation, or indicators of a sustainable turning point in the green transition of mobility? What deeper trends could influence our future mobilities and lifestyles?
This special series aims to question the ecological dimension of mobility in light of the changes, adaptations, and statements observed since the beginning of the response to the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020. To avoid the risk of analytical shortsightedness, this series favors insights that are part of a long-term approach, aimed at understanding turning points or continuities in mobility practices and how contemporary mobility policies are conceptualized and implemented. This collection of papers will also allow us to better characterize and discuss the notion of transition in terms of mobility. While initial assessment data from quantitative and qualitative surveys may shed light on the processes at hand, the contributions will present case studies based on completed or ongoing research. This work is part of a multidisciplinary approach and intends to bring together researchers, political decision-makers and public-policy professionals.
Articles in this series:
- “Tactical cycling urbanism and the health crisis”, by Laurent Chapelon, Sandrine Depeau, Benoît Feildel, Adrien Lammoglia, Maëlle Lucas, Nathalie Ortar, and Adrien Poisson
- “The Myth of Urban Exodus from Paris: Mobility in Times of Health Crisis”, by Nadine Cattan, Olivier Telle, Céline Vacchiani‑Marcuzzo, Joséphin Béraud, and Ludovic Chalonge
- “‘Revenge Travel’: Aeromobilities and the aviation industry after the Pandemic”, by Weiqiang Lin
- “A sustained fall in post-Covid car use? The case of the Lyon metropolitan area”, by Stéphanie Vincent, Olivier Klein, Ali El Zein, Pascal Pochet, and Adrien Beziat
- “Have metropolitan mobility policies been redefined by the Covid pandemic?”, by Jean Debrie and Juliette Maulat
